<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alagna.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alagna.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alagna.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dot Brand Solutions Comments on New TLDs</title>
		<link>http://alagna.com/2012/dot-brand-solutions-comments-on-new-tlds_376?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dot-brand-solutions-comments-on-new-tlds</link>
		<comments>http://alagna.com/2012/dot-brand-solutions-comments-on-new-tlds_376#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alagna.com/?p=376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our CEO, Ben Crawford, was in Santa Monica last week to meet with several customers and resellers and while he was in town, commented in a news article for the LA Biz Journal about New TLDs. Ben pointed out that &#8230; <a href="http://alagna.com/2012/dot-brand-solutions-comments-on-new-tlds_376">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alagna.com/2012/dot-brand-solutions-comments-on-new-tlds_376/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ANA Proposes &#8220;Do Not Sell&#8221; List</title>
		<link>http://alagna.com/2012/ana-proposes-do-not-sell-list_372?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ana-proposes-do-not-sell-list</link>
		<comments>http://alagna.com/2012/ana-proposes-do-not-sell-list_372#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Name News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Top Level Domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alagna.com/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s sad to see the ANA so engaged in opposing new TLDs &#038; the ICANN process now that ICANN is already taking applications. The ANA&#8217;s leadership continues to do their members a disservice. I don&#8217;t know the leadership of the &#8230; <a href="http://alagna.com/2012/ana-proposes-do-not-sell-list_372">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alagna.com/2012/ana-proposes-do-not-sell-list_372/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICANN Says It Has 25 Registrants For New Top-Level Domain Names</title>
		<link>http://alagna.com/2012/icann-says-it-has-25-registrants-for-new-top-level-domain-names_369?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=icann-says-it-has-25-registrants-for-new-top-level-domain-names</link>
		<comments>http://alagna.com/2012/icann-says-it-has-25-registrants-for-new-top-level-domain-names_369#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alagna.com/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the number of applications for the new web addresses could run higher. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, says it has approved 25 “successful registrants” since it began accepting applications for new generic top-level domain &#8230; <a href="http://alagna.com/2012/icann-says-it-has-25-registrants-for-new-top-level-domain-names_369">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alagna.com/2012/icann-says-it-has-25-registrants-for-new-top-level-domain-names_369/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rod Beckstrom Interviewed on PBS</title>
		<link>http://alagna.com/2012/rod-beckstrom-interviewed-on-pbs_363?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rod-beckstrom-interviewed-on-pbs</link>
		<comments>http://alagna.com/2012/rod-beckstrom-interviewed-on-pbs_363#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alagna.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ICANN President, Rod Beckstrom was recently interviewed as part of a debate on new TLDs. He did a good job. It&#8217;s sad to see the ANA misunderstand most of the nuances of new TLDs. It&#8217;s a disservice to their members. &#8230; <a href="http://alagna.com/2012/rod-beckstrom-interviewed-on-pbs_363">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alagna.com/2012/rod-beckstrom-interviewed-on-pbs_363/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surge of Articles About New TLDs Likely</title>
		<link>http://alagna.com/2012/surge-of-articles-about-new-tlds-likely_355?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=surge-of-articles-about-new-tlds-likely</link>
		<comments>http://alagna.com/2012/surge-of-articles-about-new-tlds-likely_355#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Name News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Top Level Domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alagna.com/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re only two days away from seeing an open window for new Top Level Domain (TLD) applications. So expect a lot of press over the next week, but don&#8217;t expect many answers about who is applying and what new TLDs &#8230; <a href="http://alagna.com/2012/surge-of-articles-about-new-tlds-likely_355">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alagna.com/2012/surge-of-articles-about-new-tlds-likely_355/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go Daddy Bets on Web-Address Expansion Beyond .Com</title>
		<link>http://alagna.com/2012/go-daddy-bets-on-web-address-expansion-beyond-com_350?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=go-daddy-bets-on-web-address-expansion-beyond-com</link>
		<comments>http://alagna.com/2012/go-daddy-bets-on-web-address-expansion-beyond-com_350#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alagna.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In spite of some opposition, everything seems to be going forward for new Top Level Domains. This article appeared on Bloomberg.com today&#8230; The expansion of the Web’s address system beyond .com and .net has sparked a land rush among startups &#8230; <a href="http://alagna.com/2012/go-daddy-bets-on-web-address-expansion-beyond-com_350">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alagna.com/2012/go-daddy-bets-on-web-address-expansion-beyond-com_350/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC Chairman Weighs in on New TLDs</title>
		<link>http://alagna.com/2011/ftc-chairman-weighs-in-on-new-tlds_338?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ftc-chairman-weighs-in-on-new-tlds</link>
		<comments>http://alagna.com/2011/ftc-chairman-weighs-in-on-new-tlds_338#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 09:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domain Names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Top Level Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new tlds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alagna.com/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chairman Jon Leibowitz wrote a letter to ICANN yesterday asking them to: &#8220;(1) implement the new gTLD program as a pilot program and substantially reduce the number of gTLDs that are introduced in the first application round, (2) strengthen ICANN’s &#8230; <a href="http://alagna.com/2011/ftc-chairman-weighs-in-on-new-tlds_338">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alagna.com/2011/ftc-chairman-weighs-in-on-new-tlds_338/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Says It Will Not Block The New Gtld Program</title>
		<link>http://alagna.com/2011/u-s-says-it-will-not-block-the-new-gtld-program_315?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=u-s-says-it-will-not-block-the-new-gtld-program</link>
		<comments>http://alagna.com/2011/u-s-says-it-will-not-block-the-new-gtld-program_315#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alagna.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was encouraged by two articles today. I predicted many times that the ANA and other obstructionists, would not block ICANN from introducing new TLDs next year. It appears that their only recourses may be to go to court or &#8230; <a href="http://alagna.com/2011/u-s-says-it-will-not-block-the-new-gtld-program_315">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alagna.com/2011/u-s-says-it-will-not-block-the-new-gtld-program_315/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

