Big Brands Should Embrace New TLDs & Stop Giving Away Money

Advertisers have given Verisign a free gift worth billions of dollars over the past 10 years.

Sports Stadium Naming Rights are Similar to Domain Names (New TLDs)

Sports Stadium Naming Rights are Similar to Domain Names (New TLDs)

Sports Stadiums provide a great analogy…

What do office supplies have to do with basketball? What does oil have to do with football?

Yet, Staples will pay the Lakers $116 million dollars and Lucas Oil will pay the Indianapolis Colts about the same (over 20 years) to associate their company names with these stadiums (1). These companies understand the value of an audience; the value of millions of eyeballs… and they gladly pay to have their brand viewed by millions of people even though those eyeballs are mostly interested in the sports.

Yet those same advertisers don’t consider the billions of dollars in aggregate cumulative advertising value that they are giving away for free… to Verisign when they advertise their dot.com domain names year after year after year on television, radio, billboards, and magazines… all around the world.

I’ve been trying to make the point on the value of new TLDs to advertisers for a long time and I think I can demonstrate it better by using the analogy of “sports stadium naming rights”.  When you consider the amount of money spent on stadium naming rights it’s easy to see that smart brands consider it a successful strategy.  In its simplest form, naming rights can be defined as the privilege of associating a sponsor’s name with a building, project, or event by including the sponsor’s name in the title of the item being named (2). Millions are spent on naming rights and are generally just a part of large brand ad budgets.

So here is the comparison: Although the ways and means are different it’s accurate to say that… sports teams attract attention… and large advertisers attract attention.

And a huge amount of valuable exposure inures to any TLD (.com / .net / .org / .whatever) that is attached to a large advertiser’s brand. Dot.com (Verisign) has been the primary recipient of that benefit… without question… for free… for at least ten years. If you wanted to take this analogy further, brands might even suggest that Verisign pay them to advertise .com as part of their brand name. Even with the benefits of a short URL, I’m actually a bit surprised at the reported amount ($350K) that Overstock paid for o.co (3).  They could likely, easily acquire their own TLD next year for a bargain price of $185K. There is no doubt that the dot.co registry wants famous brands to use their TLD and that they are benefiting greatly by Overstock’s advertising dollars (The .co management team is one of the smartest and best in the domain name business).

All in all, considering the amounts that large brands spend on advertising every year, wouldn’t they just be better off using their own TLD?  If brands used and advertised their own TLDs, all of their ad dollars would inure to their own brands, and the need to protect a brand across every possible TLD in existence would also be reduced.  This is especially true since there are now so many legal and procedural processes in place to protect brands online anyway.

Naming Rights on Sports Stadiums and New TLDs

Naming Rights on Sports Stadiums and New TLDs

And with the barrier to entry that new TLDs provide (a cost of $185K) there is a clear and obvious long-term benefit to brands acquiring their own new TLDs.

Finally, consider Paul Stahura’s Circle ID article in 2009. Paul’s study showed that “the vast majority of trademark holders are not registering their trademarks in all the current generic TLDs, let alone all the TLDs.”(4) There is good reason for this. It doesn’t necessarily pay to register your famous brand in anything else except for the most used (most advertised) TLDs.  The only TLDs that are “typed in” by end users with regularity are .com and .org, and a few of the most significant ccTLDs like .us, and .de; country codes of the largest commercial economies of the world.  This is because they are the only ones that are widely advertised. People know about them and use them, so brands need to be protected under them.

But the need to register a brand under every possible new TLD will be greatly diminished in a world of dot.brands.  I wish that the ANA and other trade groups would begin sharing the opportunities rather than telling their members that the sky is falling. It will be too late very soon.

To learn more about this topic, send for a copy of my free white paper on how brands can use new TLDs to stop cyber-squatters (5). Disclaimer: Yes, I work for a registry and have an interest in new TLDs, but I wouldn’t be promoting them if I didn’t think they were a fantastic idea for big brands.

Sources:
(1) http://www.forbes.com/2006/11/14/baseball-mets-citigroup-biz_cz_kb_1114naming_slide_2.html?thisSpeed=undefined
(2) http://cba.unomaha.edu/faculty/mohara/web/alsb01valuingnamingrights.pdf
(3) http://domainnamewire.com/2010/07/19/overstock-com-buys-o-co-for-350000/
(4) http://www.circleid.com/posts/20090202_analysis_domain_names_registered_new_gtlds/
(5) https://alagna.com/HowBrandsCanUseNewTLDSToStopCybersquatters-v3.pdf

Posted in ccTLDs, Domain Names, New Top Level Domains, Plain Interesting, Trademarks, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Big Brands Should Embrace New TLDs & Stop Giving Away Money

The ANA Has The Wrong Read on New TLDs

I’ve been watching the dialogue at the ANA and other large advertising associations with dismay.

With all due respect, the ANA is reminding me of journalism professionals who don’t want to let go of their past to embrace the online world (I’m not speaking of all journalists, but of those who don’t/can’t accept change). For example, newspapers may be losing advertisers to the Internet, but rather than complaining and commiserating, they should be embracing online video which is taking advertisers from television and cable. Advertisers aren’t disappearing, they are just migrating to systems that get them better results. There are always opportunities in change if we think clearly about them!

The point is this… I don’t think the ANA can stop this round of new TLDs.

So the ANA would do their members better by quickly focusing on the opportunities rather than the difficulties. In fact, companies that are not studying this closely right now are almost already too late. Experts suggest that if a company/organization wants the best chance of acquiring their own TLD, they will need to have their application in by the beginning of the deadline in January, rather than waiting till April.

Why, you ask?  Because, although ICANN has been very thorough in their Policy Development Process, there are indications that “who applies first” can become “a” factor. ICANN has reserved the ability to make changes in the process and may not have accounted for every possible scenario.

The timing of your application may very well matter. And that doesn’t include all the time necessary to prepare the application itself; a significant matter.


(Update from Joe: After I wrote this post, it was reported that there will be no advantage to file early – http://domainincite.com/new-gtlds-no-advantage-to-applying-early/ – however, even in ICANN’s TLD Application System (TAS) they state that applicants should apply way before the deadline…

I suspect that 1.) some of the objectors and 2.) those companies who are most silent about new TLDs right now (and there are many) will be the first to apply; they have an interest in limiting the competition. I’m not suggesting this is the ANA’s motivation, just that they could serve their members better by focusing on the opportunities while there’s still some time.

I wrote a white paper on how new TLDs can help large advertisers. In fact it is my contention that if large advertisers had been able to get their own TLDs from the start, including the price barrier, they would have been better off and cyber-squatting would have been less an issue than it is today. My white paper explains why…

http://www.alagna.com/HowBrandsCanUseNewTLDSToStopCybersquatting-v3.pdf

I think large brands have a tremendous opportunity. It’s too bad there isn’t much time and the ANA isn’t helping them to understand the opportunities this can bring.

Posted in ICANN, New Top Level Domains | Comments Off on The ANA Has The Wrong Read on New TLDs

How Good Is The Domain Name Business?

Are you considering becoming a top-level-domain name registry?

If you are a potential applicant for a new top level domain name you may be asking yourself or your staff, “How good is the domain name business?” or “Should we be involved in a new top level domain?”  I’ve been in the business for over 10 years and I admit that I ask myself this same question each year, just as part of my professional self assessment.  I must say, that I always come back with the decision to stay in this business.  Here are some reasons why:

Profitability: Although profit margins on most domain names are squeezed because of competition, it is a “transactional sale”.  This means that, as long as you keep the processes automated (which is generally easy to do in the domain name business), any amount of net profit is high because the cost of provisioning the product is so low.

This formula changes if you are operating a sponsored or restricted registry because there is a cost involved in verification (making sure that a registrant qualifies for the domain name). But certainly the process of verification can be automated in many ways as well.

Predictability: One of the most valuable aspects of the domain name business is that once registrants choose a domain they tend to keep it.  Renewal rates in the industry are in the realm of 60% to 85%. This allows for business predictability and steady growth.  In effect, the success of your customer’s businesses (and/or hobbies or personal interests) are directly tied to your domain business and because renewal rates are predictable, this ensures much easier business planning.

Business Risk: The domain name industry is digital.  You are selling digital assets that have plenty of upside and really no risk of loss. If you are defrauded by credit card fraud, you just cancel the domain. You’ve not borne the cost of shipping, you’ve not lost any physical goods, and you completely control the asset (as a registry).  It is painful to see how many businesses that ship physical goods nationally and internationally, lose their shirts on fraud or mistakes.  The domain name business carries none of this kind of loss potential.

Repeat / Cross-Selling Opportunities: Almost every business and/or non-profit, or organization in the world needs a web site today.  This has become a fact of life.  A web site is often the most practical and basic need in business communications.  In fact, it is often one of the first things that a company does when opening its doors.  A domain name registry (or registrar) has access to businesses from the moment of their inception so it is a grand entree` for other business services.  Most domain name registrars also offer web hosting, merchant accounts, privacy settings, directory listings, marketing services, etc.  The potential for upgrades and additional business services offered to domain name registrants is limited only by your imagination.

Growth Potential: When I started in the industry, I couldn’t believe it when we passed the million-domain-names-registered mark.  Today, according to Verisign’s Domain Name Brief, the industry is at 215 million domain names registered across all top level domains.  Most experts believe that this is just the beginning.  Certainly, the Internet is being exploited as a medium, but from a business standpoint (businesses using the Internet as a channel for communication and sales) it is only just beginning.  I have no doubt that as more and more businesses and individuals find uses for the Internet, that these numbers will double.

New top level domain names will open up several opportunities for companies and individuals world-wide and it will become easier for an entity to find a practical domain name that they identify with because there will be so many more choices.  I don’t buy the idea that the Internet will become confusing because of these new choices.  If the Internet existed when I was in second grade, I would have been able to tell the difference between ford.com, ford.car, and even car.ford. It’s basic second grade reading; not that complicated.  Internet users will be able to tell the difference and understand the choices. Services will be provided to assist people in finding their way around.

Stability: Many businesses are cyclical and dependent on the economy and business cycles.  Think real estate or retail.  They are often also dependent on locales.  California & Nevada have been especially hard hit by the recession; The Internet is global in nature and thus, more resistant to local and national business cycles.  It has it’s ups and downs, booms and busts, but overall has continued to grow.

Security: Just like we still use physical addresses to identify the locations of our homes and businesses in the 21st century, we will need virtual addresses to identify our virtual locations for the foreseeable future.  This need should be a staple for many years to come and domain names are at the very heart of this system.

The Domain Name System was born out of a very human attribute, we remember names easier than we do numbers. That attribute seems very unlikely to change.  Staking your claim in the virtual world via the domain name industry (or a new Top Level Domain) seems to be a safe bet on the future, assuming you choose and win a TLD with a market behind it.

Competition: A domain name registry is a natural monopoly.  Although registrants can register other names and other endings, if they want your ending bad enough, you are the only place they can get it.  And there is still a ton of growth waiting to happen in the e-commerce world.

Disclaimer: This article is not meant to be a sales pitch of any kind. It is not meant to advocate or oppose your decision about whether to invest in a new TLD.  I only mean to share my thoughts and observations of this industry as compared to others and give you my insight.  Running a domain name registry is a challenge and if you are going to get involved, you’d better be prepared with a good idea and a strong market.  But if you think you have those things, I can’t think of a better industry to be involved in.  In fact, the points I’ve made here are only some of the positive aspects.  There are many more.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on How Good Is The Domain Name Business?

New Top Level Domain (TLD) Experts Speak Out

CentralNic’s CEO, Ben Crawford, recently appeared on an informational video put out by ICANN.  Most of these, are people who have been involved in the domain name space for many years and who’ve played a part in the history and growth of the domain names space.

The video features registry experts from across the board:

  •     Ben Crawford, CentralNic
  •     Brian Cute, PIR
  •     Karim Jiwani, .Pro
  •     Ken Hansen, Neustar
  •     Nacho Amadaz, .CAT
  •     Pat Kane, Verisign
  •     Pinky Brand, .Mobi
  •     Robert LaPlante, Afilias

New Top Level Domains (TLDs) represent the most significant change to the Internet since it’s inception. This is not the first time that new TLDs have been allowed but it is the first time that they have been allowed on this scale.

I don’t like to “hype” things but there is a certain urgency to making decisions on top level domains today.  Any brand with a significant ad spend needs to pay attention.  Entrepreneurs who want to build significant, predictable businesses need to pay attention.  And association executives, who represent significant communities in almost any large vertical market, need to pay attention.

I participated in a webinar yesterday, put on by one of the world’s most respected international law and business advisory firms, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP.  They are recommending that applicants have their strategy in place by Octover 31, 2010.  They also suggested that the decision to apply for a new TLD be made at the highest levels within a corporation/entity.

If you’d like more information, please contact me.  For a more lengthy presentation on new TLDs, you may also want to view the ICANN panel below which occurred earlier this month in London.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on New Top Level Domain (TLD) Experts Speak Out