New York To Los Angeles in 12 Minutes

I ran across a video made last year about an experimental aircraft that can fly at hypersonic speeds (20 times the speed of sound).

The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) did a test flight of an aircraft capable of flying 13,000 miles per hour; fast enough to make a flight from New York to Los Angeles in 12 minutes. The research is being done for the Pentagon for a fast strike military vehicle capable of delivering a military strike anywhere in the world in less than an hour.

Although the test flight reached its target speed, it only kept it for about 3 minutes and the flight ended in about 9 minutes; still an amazing feet that demonstrates the advances in aeronautics.

DARPA is the same division of the Pentagon that created the forerunner to our modern Internet. The vehicle is called the Falcon and is shaped like an arrowhead.

Read the story… | Source: LA Times | Date posted: 4/22/2012

Posted in Inspiration, Uncategorized | Comments Off on New York To Los Angeles in 12 Minutes

A New, More Customer-Friendly Type Of Web Address Is Coming

It was nice to run across an article today about new Top Level Domains that described them as “Customer-Friendly”.  We need more positive press about new TLDs.  There are plenty enough painting them in a negative way.

The truth is that new TLDs are neither positive nor negative. They’re just a new and more flexible way to address websites.

The word “dotcom” has always been synonymous with the internet and domain names. But, despite being the most popular, the .com domain has for a long time been only one of many top level domains, and a new programme from the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) will see the number of available top level domains explode well into the hundreds.

Soon you may be checking out the newest film release at a .movie website, ordering dinner from www.dominos.pizza, or booking a hotel room at www.auckland.hilton.

 
Read the story… | Source: National Business Review | Date posted: 4/22/2012

Posted in Domain Name News, Domain Names, ICANN, New Top Level Domains, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on A New, More Customer-Friendly Type Of Web Address Is Coming

New and Old Top Level Domain Names (TLDs)

I’ve had an interest in history for many years, especially in the business world.  I collect old books about selling and marketing and I think I have an above average knowledge of the history behind modern sales methods and modern marketing.

Another area that I’ve studied is the Domain Name System (DNS) and I enjoy seeking out the roots behind  ideas, especially when it is relevant to the times.  I dug this piece out of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comment (RFC) archives today and felt that it is especially so.

I never met Jon Postel, but I have quoted him often in my work and we all owe him our gratitude for being an ambassador to the world for the domain name system. Mr. Postel took the domain name system to a new level in 1996 when he authored this RFC about International country-code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs).  Today, ICANN continues that tradition by opening up TLDs to a new level of freedom and commercialism.  Opinions continue to vary about the wisdom of pushing this envelope but I think that ultimately it will be proven for more good than harm.

Some of you will enjoy this small part of Internet history…

New Registries and iTLDs               June 1996

Two points must be kept in mind: (a) domain names are and must be unique, and (b) trademarked names are not necessarily unique (and the are many examples of non-unique trademarks).

There are no international trademarks.  There is no official
international registry of world wide trademarks.  Trademarks
may be registered per country (and in the United States (at
least) per State).  The World Intellectual Property
Organization offers an international arbitration service on
such matters.

There are “strong” trademarks that are registered in many
countries and are vigorously defended.  These may come close to
being unique.  There are many “not so strong” trademarks that
may be regional or business sector specific (for example,
United Air Lines and United Van Lines, or the Acme Brick
Company and the Acme Electric Corporation)).

There are two conflicting goals of different trademark holders
with respect to domain names: (a) to protect their trademarks
against infringement, and (2) to have access to the domain name system to use their trademarks in a domain name.

Trademark infringement is the use of a trademarked name in a
way that may confuse the consumer about the source or quality
of a product or service.  For strong trademarks there may also
be infringement if the use of a trademarked name dilutes the
value of the trademark.

Holders of strong trademarks want to control every use of their
trademark.  These people would say it is pointless to create
additional top level domains since they will acquire, reserve,
and otherwise protect their trademarked name in every top-level domain so no new users will get access to domain names this way, and besides you are just making more work for the lawyers. While these holders of strong trademarks might not actually acquire their names in all the possible top-level domains (no extra income to the registries), they probably would take steps to stop any infringement thus making those name unavailable to anyone else (extra income to the lawyers).

Holders of not so strong trademarks want the ability to use
their trademarked name in a domain name while some other holder
of the same mark for a different purpose also can use their
trademarked name in a domain name.  These people would say it is essential to create additional top-level domains to permit
fair access to domain names by holders of not so strong
trademarks.

I would suggest that the number of not so strong trademarks far
exceeds the number of strong trademarks and that the domain
name system should provide for the needs of the many rather
than protecting the privileges of the few.  Thus new top-level
domains should be created.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Postel

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-postel-iana-itld-admin-01.txt

Posted in Domain Names, Inspiration, New Top Level Domains, Trademarks | Comments Off on New and Old Top Level Domain Names (TLDs)

ICANN To Use “Digital Archery” Method for Secondary Batching in New TLDs

ICANN announced today that since they received over 500 applications they are triggering the use of “Digital Archery” as part of the batching of applications. The last report I saw stated that there were 839 applicants.

It had been stated that they weren’t going to use a first come, first served method and also that they didn’t want for it to be a lottery of any kind.

I had been struggling for some time to understand why what they were going to do. Now that things have played out I can see some of the reasons they didn’t want to do those things. If it were first come, first served, there wouldn’t have been a fair way to deal with same string applications that came in later. If it had been a pick from the hat, it could have been judged an illegal lottery. Both of those methods have problems.

To put it as simply as possible, this method first gives applicants a way to opt out of the digital archery method if time isn’t important to them. Then involves having the remaining applicants participate in process where they…

  1. select a time date in the future
  2. try to ping a server as close to that time as possible

The differences in time they picked and the time they pinged the server to match that initial pick (regardless of before or after) are then compared and ranked. Then any matching strings are grouped with the winners regardless of how they did in the competition so they can be judged together. There is also a locational element to make it fair for applicants from around the globe.

It seems like a game to me, but I guess business can be like a game very often can’t it?

You may review the announcement here:

www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-28mar12-en.htm

Ok,

This makes it clearer…

http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/tas/batching-basics

I can’t believe it! It’s really like playing darts (at least part of it)!

LOL

Geographic regions explained more here…

http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/montreal/geo-regions-topic.htm

Here is a quote directly from the ICANN announcement:

The batching selection process determines how applications will be divided into batches and prioritized for evaluation analysis. Conceptually, the batching selection process is relatively straightforward and includes the following four steps:

  1. Applicants register in an online batching system to select their batching preference (i.e., earliest or any batch) and select a target date and time (e.g., Target Date: 10 May 2012 and Target Time: 12:00:00 UTC);
  2. Applicants re-enter the online batching system and generate a message that is sent from their computer/system to the online batching system. The online batching system records the date and time the applicant’s message is received. (e.g., Message Received Date: 10 May 2012 and Message Received Time: 12:00:01);
  3. The system calculates the time variance between the applicant’s Target Date/Time from step 1 and the Message Received Date/Time from step 2. This time variance is known as the applicant’s “secondary timestamp” Based on the example in steps 1 and 2 above the secondary timestamp is 1 second. The closer to zero the secondary timestamp is the more likely the application will be processed in the earliest batch, assuming the applicant has opted in to the earliest batch.
  4. The batching selection process then combines the applicant’s batching preference (i.e., earliest or any batch), the “secondary timestamp” (e.g., 1 second), and the geographic region to determine the batch/processing order for the specific application.
Posted in Domain Name News, Domain Names, ICANN, New Top Level Domains, Registries | Comments Off on ICANN To Use “Digital Archery” Method for Secondary Batching in New TLDs